Review history for OpenKritt × OpenAI; each dated run records its source-specific coverage and limits.
openkritt-openai.md
Loading report…
Original review plus 2 dated follow-up sections, with findings, accepted risks, fixes, deferred work and coverage limits in this file.
Initial review: GlazeCorp reviewed using OpenAI gpt-6-sol at ultra reasoning effort with OpenKritt (pinned at 43e1d19a).
Focused tasks and finding validation. Breaks a review into smaller tasks, combines the results and supports validation and deduplication. Each run records which stages actually completed.
Requested program: Daybreak Blue. Recorded model ID: gpt-6-sol. The runner did not return a separate program identity.
This file includes 2 dated follow-up sections. Each records its own models, settings, source revision, outcome and project responses.
Initial reviewed revision: e140b6724247425d2fa506d9bb31832d54be71c7Initial reviewed source. Each dated follow-up section records its own source revision, actual coverage, model identity and settings; later fixes are identified separately.
Review history for OpenKritt × OpenAI; each dated run records its source-specific coverage and limits.
openkritt-openai.md
Original review plus 2 dated follow-up sections, with findings, accepted risks, fixes, deferred work and coverage limits in this file.
Initial review: GlazeCorp reviewed using OpenAI gpt-6-sol at ultra reasoning effort with OpenKritt (pinned at 43e1d19a).
Focused tasks and finding validation. Breaks a review into smaller tasks, combines the results and supports validation and deduplication. Each run records which stages actually completed.
Requested program: Daybreak Blue. Recorded model ID: gpt-6-sol. The runner did not return a separate program identity.
This file includes 2 dated follow-up sections. Each records its own models, settings, source revision, outcome and project responses.
Initial reviewed revision: e140b6724247425d2fa506d9bb31832d54be71c7Initial reviewed source. Each dated follow-up section records its own source revision, actual coverage, model identity and settings; later fixes are identified separately.
Findings and responses
Project responses updated October 9, 2026. Latest inventory: 133 observations including duplicates; 125 accepted, two locally remediated Periphery observations, six deferred in whole or part, zero undecided contract portions. The Periphery fix passed 43 contract and 21 SDK tests; the owner waived its additional independent re-audit, which was not run. Acceptance is not remediation; deferred work stays open.
Project responses updated October 5, 2026. Original reviewer labels are preserved. Accepted risks are not fixes; local verification is separate from independent re-audit. Findings refer to the source revision on this report, not every later contract change.
This index includes reported findings, leads and rejected observations from the recorded passes. Repeated or overlapping entries are retained with their source IDs; they must not be counted as separate confirmed vulnerabilities.
Original observation status: Source-disclosed policy requires owner disposition.
Project review: R002-FINAL-008 — Direct Bribe routing can start a stream with no signal weight.
Disposition: Accepted zero-weight Bribe funding risk; no contract change.
Response: The owner conditionally accepted this finding if Curve MultiRewards retains the same zero-stake behavior, preferring minimal deviation from the upstream accounting. A read-only comparison confirms that condition. This is project risk acceptance, not a fix or an upstream security endorsement.
Remaining work / limits: Keep the loss of elapsed unallocated rewards and permissionless-admission difference explicit in reward documentation. Preserve the upstream comparison, original audit observations and evidence limits. No contract changes, tests, deployed-behavior verification, broader safety conclusion, or freeze closure are claimed.
Original observation status: Conditional Low pending realistic asset feasibility.
Project review: R002-FINAL-002 — Extreme accumulated V4 fees can prevent position changes and exits.
Disposition: Accepted risk; no contract change for this finding.
Response: The owner chose to retain the native Uniswap V4 full-range design and accept its accumulated-position-fee limit rather than add a separate prevention mechanism. The limit remains present; this decision does not establish that intended assets cannot reach it.
Remaining work / limits: Keep the accepted limitation visible in release and asset-compatibility documentation, and assess intended assets' supply and issuer powers without claiming that work is already complete. Preserve existing fee-processing behavior during the finding-001 refactor. Original evidence and OpenKritt Claude 019's pending human confirmation remain unchanged. No fix, new test, live-asset safety determination, or freeze closure is claimed.
Disposition: Accepted fractional checkpoint rounding loss; no contract change.
Response: The owner accepted the existing rounding behavior after reviewing that fractions are discarded when accounting advances, more frequent updates can increase the loss, and preserving those fractions would require additional accounting. This records acceptance of the limitation, not a verified fix or a universal claim that its economic impact is negligible.
Remaining work / limits: Keep the permanent fractional-entitlement loss and denomination-dependent impact explicit in reward-accounting documentation. Preserve original auditor conclusions, severity and evidence limits. No contract change, new test execution, deployment verification or source-freeze closure is claimed.
<!-- current-followups -->
OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up — FR-01 — Position updates permanently discard fractional fee entitlement
Review: OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up. Reviewed source:91206a4ed18c514cdad3f8e8b09e0ca08ffd3ffb. Model: gpt-daybreak-blue-latest. Settings: ultra requested; returned effort unavailable.
Disposition: ACCEPTED_RISK.
Response: FR01: ACCEPTED_RISK — Retain native V4 fractional fee rounding, including permissionless update frequency; no fractional fee carry.
OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up — BIND-01 — RevenueSplitter does not bind the auction to the intended GLAZE payment asset
Review: OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up. Reviewed source:91206a4ed18c514cdad3f8e8b09e0ca08ffd3ffb. Model: gpt-daybreak-blue-latest. Settings: ultra requested; returned effort unavailable.
Disposition: RELEASECHECKOPEN.
Response: DEP01: RELEASECHECKOPEN — Retain deployment verification as the control. Actual runtime, immutable graph, token and chain verification remain required.
OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up — INT-01 — Manager pool loading assumes the Coin is currency0
Review: OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up. Reviewed source:91206a4ed18c514cdad3f8e8b09e0ca08ffd3ffb. Model: gpt-daybreak-blue-latest. Settings: ultra requested; returned effort unavailable.
Disposition: DEFERRED.
Response: OFFCHAIN: DEFERRED — Non-contract backlog recorded for later under the owner directive. No completion or acceptance of a defect is inferred.
OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up — INT-02 — Fee-management UI misstates who controls already-realized swap credits
Review: OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up. Reviewed source:91206a4ed18c514cdad3f8e8b09e0ca08ffd3ffb. Model: gpt-daybreak-blue-latest. Settings: ultra requested; returned effort unavailable.
Disposition: DEFERRED.
Response: DOCS: DEFERRED — Documentation and client disclosure recorded for later under the owner directive. No completion or acceptance of a defect is inferred.
OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up — FR-02 — Fee recipient setters permit known token sinks
Review: OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up. Reviewed source:91206a4ed18c514cdad3f8e8b09e0ca08ffd3ffb. Model: gpt-daybreak-blue-latest. Settings: ultra requested; returned effort unavailable.
Disposition: ACCEPTED_RISK.
Response: FR03: ACCEPTED_RISK — Retain configurable fee recipients and their custody/misconfiguration risk; no generic recovery guard.
OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up — Result
Review: OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up. Reviewed source:91206a4ed18c514cdad3f8e8b09e0ca08ffd3ffb. Model: gpt-daybreak-blue-latest. Settings: ultra requested; returned effort unavailable.
Disposition: ASSURANCE_OPEN.
Response: ASSURANCE: ASSURANCE_OPEN — Preserve original run outcome, refusals, skipped/inconclusive checks, bounded validation and dependency uncertainty. A completed annotation is not completion of the audit campaign.
OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up — Report outcome / coverage record
Review: OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up. Reviewed source:91206a4ed18c514cdad3f8e8b09e0ca08ffd3ffb. Model: gpt-daybreak-blue-latest. Settings: ultra requested; returned effort unavailable.
Disposition: ASSURANCE_OPEN.
Response: ASSURANCE: ASSURANCE_OPEN — Preserve original run outcome, refusals, skipped/inconclusive checks, bounded validation and dependency uncertainty. A completed annotation is not completion of the audit campaign.
OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 8 follow-up — outcome and project response
Review: OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 8 follow-up. Reviewed source:ff973d5ca9e137f5561de88b22d8a53f221f9e19. Model: gpt-daybreak-blue-latest. Settings: ultra requested; independent echo unavailable.
The provider blocked this attempt. It did not produce a completed review or a new registered finding. The attempted scope and block remain recorded in the review history.
Review summary and follow-ups
Status: Completed bounded review.
Result
One conditional Medium and two Low findings in completed scan 4.
Scope and limits
39/39 primary files directly read; 96 imports inventoried with targeted path review. The Daybreak access-program field was not attested.
Original run evidence is preserved separately. The findings and project responses on this page record the subsequent owner review and remediation status. This summary does not certify deployment safety or count historical Veridise and V12 work as coverage of this freeze.
<!-- current-followups -->
Current project response
Project responses updated October 9, 2026. Latest inventory: 133 observations including duplicates; 125 accepted, two locally remediated Periphery observations, six deferred in whole or part, zero undecided contract portions. The Periphery fix passed 43 contract and 21 SDK tests; the owner waived its additional independent re-audit, which was not run. Acceptance is not remediation; deferred work stays open.
OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 6 follow-up
Reviewed source: 91206a4ed18c514cdad3f8e8b09e0ca08ffd3ffb. Status captured 2026-10-06.
Recorded outcome: INCOMPLETESAFETYANDHARNESSPIN_SCOPE.
Runner model selection: gpt-daybreak-blue-latest. Historical returned-model field: not independently returned. Separate server-attested identity: not independently returned. Requested reasoning setting ultra. Returned effort: not independently echoed.
Harness revision: 43e1d19a00ce50bd93253d1c6c3a48cfffbcc4c3. FullRange-focused scope and supporting integrations; this is not a new 39-contract review.
Later source changes include manager permissions, forced exit for revoked managers, buyback basket selection, richer events, launch caps, component getters, and fee-preparing Periphery redemption. October 8 follow-ups reviewed the resulting October 7 candidate. The later October 9 fee opt-out received local validation and owner acceptance with the additional re-audit waived.
Original executable evidence and provider transcripts remain private. This is a source-specific public summary, not a downloadable original, complete-coverage certificate or professional audit by the harness author.
OpenKritt × Daybreak Blue · October 8 follow-up
Reviewed source: ff973d5ca9e137f5561de88b22d8a53f221f9e19. Status captured 2026-10-09.
2026-10-08-full-method-preparation-01: BLOCKEDOPENAICYBERPOLICYREQUIREDNATIVESTEP. Pinned full native Daybreak/ultra external-flow-analysis scan 2 accepted and ran 38 completed step attempts. Required metadata 46 returned explicit OpenAI cyber_policy refusal; scan stopped with no retry or substitution, two in-flight jobs terminated. No post scripts, complete 39-primary model read or first-pass seal.
Identity/settings: Daybreak Blue and ultra selected/requested locally; server-side model/effort identity was not independently returned.
Owner review: All registered observations from this source have a decision. The two helper-redemption findings were remediated later in Periphery at 517e09a33ba1c5d506566b32398f254c5121d231; 43 contract and 21 SDK tests passed. The owner accepted that fix and waived its additional independent re-audit, which was not run.
Original executable evidence and provider transcripts remain private. This is a source-specific public summary, not a downloadable original, complete-coverage certificate or professional audit by the harness author.
